Legal Opinion
Smith v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 26, 2002No. B150973PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, Acting P. J.
Plaintiffs challenge a pilot program in Los Angeles County that makes a home visit a condition of eligibility for CalWORKs benefits. They contend the county has created an unauthorized condition; the pilot project violates the requirements for early fraud prevention and detection programs; the home searches conducted pursuant to the program violate state and federal constitutional requirements for welfare-related home searches or administrative searches; the policy imposes unconstitutional conditions on the receipt of welfare benefits; and it violates the right to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. AkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Christensen v. LightbourneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Sanchez v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Christensen v. Lightbourne, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Opinion No. (2004), California Attorney General Reports2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.