Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 1942No. 30515PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Defendant below was granted a decree of divorce on his answer and cross-petition filed in plaintiff’s action for separate maintenance, and ordered to pay to plaintiff a certain sum as permanent alimony, and an additional sum monthly for the support of two minor children. Plaintiff appeals, challenging the decree of divorce from the standpoint of the sufficiency of the cross-petition and the evidence, and asserts that the alimony awarded to herself was too small under the facts as proved.

The attack on the cross-petition is based on its failure to allege the local residence of the defendant for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beach v. BeachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  2. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Newberry v. NewberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Whitehorn v. WhitehornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  2. Good v. GoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Chappell v. ChappellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Eisenreich v. EisenreichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Herd v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API