Legal Opinion

Newman v. Newman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 8, 1930No. 19454PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HADL, C.

The defendant in error was plaintiff in the trial court. She brought this action .against her husband, Alfred. Newman, for a divorce, and joined therewith Isaiah Newman, the son of Alfred Newman, as a party defendant, for the purpose of adjudicating the property rights. A separate action was commenced by plaintiff against both of these defendants to set aside a conveyance of Alfred Newman to Isaiah. Newman whereby he conveyed all of his real property to Isaiah Newman, including the parcel theretofore conveyed to plaintiff, in consideration of the grantee supporting him, the grantor,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Good v. GoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gilcrease v. GilcreaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Haynes v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Flaxman v. FlaxmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. BIXLER v. FASSNACHT-BIXLERCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API