Legal Opinion
McKeon v. Hastings College of the Law
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 22, 1986No. A019483PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SABRAW, J.
In 1973-1974, defendant and appellant Hastings College of the Law (Hastings) began acquiring real property, including several residential hotels and apartment buildings, in order to expand its campus in downtown San Francisco. Pursuant to the Relocation Assistance Act, Hastings began efforts to facilitate resettlement of the tenants who might be displaced by the expansion project. Among these efforts were the renovation of two of the residential hotels in which displaced tenants were offered substitute subsidized housing. Hastings also established a committee to advise it in…
2Cases cited93 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Shamsian v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Bronco Wine Co. v. Frank A. Logoluso FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Venice Town Council, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Midpeninsula Citizens for Fair Housing v. Westwood InvestorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.