Legal Opinion
Midpeninsula Citizens for Fair Housing v. Westwood Investors
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 2, 1990No. H005191PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.
Midpeninsula Citizens for Fair Housing (MCFH) sued Westwood Investors and Richard Gregersen, the owners and manager of a Cupertino apartment building, claiming that the rental policy at the apartment complex limiting occupancy to one person per bedroom was discriminatory within the meaning of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.; hereafter Unruh Act.) The trial court entered judgment in favor of the Westwood defendants solely on the basis that MCFH did not have standing to sue under the Unruh Act.
In this appeal MCFH argues that it has standing both…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Lisa Martin v. International Olympic CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Angelucci v. Century Supper ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Notrica v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Blumhorst v. JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Californians for Population Stabilization v. Hewlett-Packard Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- White v. Square, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.