Legal Opinion

State v. Pickett

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 3, 1999No. 41562-0-IPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

— The State of Washington requires convicted sex offenders to register with the county sheriff, and to provide the sheriff with a residence address. But, Martin Pickett was homeless. The registration statute neither provides a way of registering for homeless individuals who have no permanent place of residence nor requires that all such offenders establish a residence upon release. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to support Pickett’s conviction for failure to register. Further, Pickett proved by a preponderance of the evidence the affirmative defense that he did not have a residence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. AlvarezWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Washington State Coalition for the Homeless v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. State of Alabama v. Thornal Lee Adams.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  5. Twine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API