State v. Pickett
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
— The State of Washington requires convicted sex offenders to register with the county sheriff, and to provide the sheriff with a residence address. But, Martin Pickett was homeless. The registration statute neither provides a way of registering for homeless individuals who have no permanent place of residence nor requires that all such offenders establish a residence upon release. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to support Pickett’s conviction for failure to register. Further, Pickett proved by a preponderance of the evidence the affirmative defense that he did not have a residence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. AlvarezWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Washington State Coalition for the Homeless v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State of Alabama v. Thornal Lee Adams.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Twine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.