Legal Opinion

United States v. Tayman

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided May 1, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 94-1575-AM. Cr. A. No. 92-112-APublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

Stephen E. Tayman received a mandatory minimum sentence of five years under 21 U.S.C. § 841 for having conspired to distribute one hundred or more kilograms of marijuana, which sentence he now attacks by a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. After Tayman’s conviction and sentence became final, it was decided in United States v. Irvin, 2 F.3d 72 (4th Cir.1993) cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 1086, 127 L.Ed.2d 401 (1994), that mandatory minimum sentences imposed under § 841 must be based on the amount of drugs that was reasonably foreseeable to the…

2Cases cited132 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Wilfredo Mario MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. Sanabria v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1996
  3. United States v. Richard Eugene SomnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. Abreu v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
  5. Songster v. BeardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API