Legal Opinion

Songster v. Beard

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 29, 2014No. Civil Action No. 04-5916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SAVAGE, District Judge.

The issue in this § 2254 habeas action is whether the holding in Miller v. Alabama,1 that a mandatory life without parole sentence for juvenile homicide defendants is unconstitutional may. be applied retroactively to cases on collateral review. The Third Circuit has yet to decide. The Eleventh Circuit, the only circuit court to address the issue, held that Miller is not retroactive.2 District courts and state courts are divided.

Those courts which have held that Miller applies retroactively have reached the result by different paths. Some based their…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Petition of State of New HampshireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  2. Songster v. BeardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Com. v. Garcia, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Klinger, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Pietrovito, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API