Legal Opinion
State v. Pasanen
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 12, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
229 N.J. Super. 553 (1989)
552 A.2d 212
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JAMES J. PASANEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CONRAD P. HEMPELE AND SHARON HEMPELE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 25, 1988.
Decided January 12, 1989.
Before Judges ANTELL, HAVEY and BROCHIN.
Susan Bielanowski argued the cause for appellant James J. Pasanen (Gannon, Murphy & Schwartz, attorneys; Edward V. Gannon, on the brief).
Boris Moczula, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HempeleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. HempeleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990