Legal Opinion

State v. Hempele

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 17, 1990PublishedCited by 191 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

The issue in these appeals, argued together, is the constitutionality of warrantless seizures and searches of garbage bags left on the curb for collection.

In State v. Hempele the trial court suppressed evidence seized under a warrant obtained after the warrantless seizure and search of defendants’ garbage. In State v. Pasanen the trial court denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained under similar circumstances. The Appellate Division affirmed both the suppression order in Hempele and the order denying suppression in Pasanen.…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by191 opinions

  1. Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. State v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. BolandWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API