Legal Opinion
State v. Hempele
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 17, 1990Published
1Opinion of the Court
120 N.J. 182 (1990)
576 A.2d 793
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CONRAD P. HEMPELE AND SHARON HEMPELE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JAMES J. PASANEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 14, 1990.
Decided July 17, 1990.
Boris Moczula argued the cause for appellant and respondent State of New Jersey (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
Edward V. Gannon argued the cause for appellant James J. Pasanen (Gannon, Murphy & Schwartz, attorneys).
Arthur J. Russo argued the cause for respondent Sharon…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited97 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.