Legal Opinion

Carter v. Slavick Jewelry Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1928No. 5421PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

The Slavick Jewelry Company is engaged in selling jewelry at retail under a plan by which it delivers possession of the merchandise sold, but retains title until the full purchase price is paid. During the period from December, 1920, to December, 1924, it made approximately 700 of such sales, for the gross aggregate price of $72,746.80, and actually received on account thereof the aggregate sum of $49,115.55. In no ease was the purchase price paid in full; in some instances the larger part remaining unpaid, and in some the balance being trifling, as, for example, $1 on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rice v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Humphries & Jackson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Crall & Ostrander v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  4. City of South Bend v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Eaton v. RicheriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Klivans, Inc. v. RoutzahnDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1931
  2. Lippman's, Inc. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Boone v. OliverosDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. Kacy M. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
  5. Raul V. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API