Legal Opinion
Raul V. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 10, 2026No. 3:25-cv-01035Unknown
1Opinion
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORINIA 10 11 RAUL V.,1 Case No.: 25cv1035-MSB 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER REVERSING AND v. REMANDING COMMISSIONER’S 14 DECISION [ECF NOS. 13 & 15] FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of 15 Social Security, 2 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 On April 24, 2025, Plaintif Raul V. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42
20 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) seeking judicial review of a final adverse decision by the 21 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”). (ECF No. 1.) Based on all parties’ 22 consent [see ECF Nos. 4, 6], this case is…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.