Legal Opinion

Kacy M. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 29, 2026No. 3:25-cv-01141Unknown

1Opinion

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORINIA 10 11 KACY M.,1 Case No.: 25cv1141-MSB 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER REVERSING AND v. REMANDING COMMISSIONER’S 14 DECISION [ECF NO. 9] FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of 15 Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 On May 5, 2025, Plaintif Kacy M. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a final adverse decision by the Commissioner of 21 Social Security (“Commissioner”). (ECF No. 1.) Based on all parties’ consent [see ECF 22 Nos. 3, 5], this case is before the undersigned as…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API