State Ex Rel Winburn v. City of Cincinnati, Unpublished Decision (1-16-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
JUDGMENT ENTRY.
This appeal, considered on the accelerated calendar under App.R. 11.1(E) and Loc.R. 12, is not controlling authority except as provided in S.Ct.R.Rep.Op. 2(G)(1).
Plaintiffs Charles Winburn and Joanne S. Kemmerer ("the taxpayers") appeal from the trial court's entry of judgment in favor of the city of Cincinnati. Finding no error in the trial court's decision, we affirm.
On April 28, 1999, the city of Cincinnati filed a civil lawsuit against the manufacturers of guns in Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- City of Philadelphia v. Beretta U.S.A., Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Hale v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Manos v. HarterOhio Court of Appeals · 1995