Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Foodland, Inc., D/B/A Super-H Discount
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 24, 1984No. 82-2580PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order finding that Foodland, Inc., doing business as Super-H Discount, violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act and requiring Foodland to bargain with two unions representing employees at Foodland’s retail grocery store in Owasso, Oklahoma. 1 Foodland admittedly refused to bargain with either of the two unions, and would justify its refusal on two alternative grounds: 1) the two bargaining units designated by the Board were inappropriate; and 2) the Board erred in not holding a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Magnesium Casting Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Daylight Grocery Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gold Spot Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Friendly Ice Cream Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Big Y Foods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Joe B. Foods, Incorporated Doing Business as Butera Finer FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- National Labor Relations Board v. L & B Cooling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Fedex Freight, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Kmart Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Kmart Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999