Legal Opinion

Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 2, 2015No. Case No. 14-cv-00113-EMCPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

Docket No. 99

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States. District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Caren Ehret filed the instant putative class action against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., alleging that Defendant violated the California Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). Docket No. 40 (First Amended Complaint) (FAC). Plaintiff contends that Uber made misrepresentations when it informed consumers that it would automatically charge a 20% “gratuity” when taxi rides were arranged through…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Jane Doe 1 v. NielsenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. Bailey v. Rite Aid CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  4. Drake v. Bayer Healthcare LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
  5. Gilbert v. MoneyMutual, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API