Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bonomo

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1958No. Appeals, Nos. 5 to 8PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

The appellant, Ralph Bonomo, was tried and convicted on four indictments. The first, charged that he committed incestuous adultery with Marion Holliday, his niece, on the 30th of December, 1956; the second, that he committed statutory rape on the said Marion Holliday on the same date; the third, that on May 19, 1957, he did tend to corrupt the morals of minors under the age of eighteen years, the minors being Marion Holliday, then age 14, and Donald Meier, then 15 years of age, by having them pose in the nude for a photograph and having them pose for photographs while…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarnakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Commonwealth v. BartellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Commonwealth v. HoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Commonwealth v. San JuanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BonomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. PiloskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. PerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. ReidenbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. BonomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API