Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bartell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1957No. Appeals, 10-13PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.:

These appeals by defendants, Joseph Kartell, Philip Brady, John Durkin, and Anthony Bonacuse are from judgments of sentence of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Lackawanna County. Defendants were indicted for conspiracy “to unlawfully, wilfully, wantonly, and maliciously damage and destroy and cause to be damaged and destroyed a certain partially built and constructed building and structure then and there situate at Number 1045 North Main Avenue, in the City of Scranton.” The prosecution arose out of the dynamiting of the dwelling which was being constructed by nonunion…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Mudano v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Commonwealth v. BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Commonwealth v. KoshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. EVANSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Commonwealth v. BennettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. AriziniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. McHUGHSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API