Commonwealth v. Pilosky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Price, J.,
Appellants, Frank Pilosky and Daniel Komada, were co-defendants below. Following a jury trial, which took place from February 6 to February 22, 1974, both *236appellants were found guilty of assault and battery,1 aggravated assault and battery,2 and forcible rape.3 A third co-defendant was found not guilty of all charges.
The record reveals the following facts: On September 25, 1972, the complainant, Kathleen Antipuna, and a friend, Arlene Bradley, entered a bar for the purpose of using the rest room. Kathleen testified that the facility was located at the rear of the bar. She…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. GoosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. BonomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. DombrauskasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Ranieli v. MUT. LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.