Legal Opinion

American Mutual Liability Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1970No. 185PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

We conclude that the circuit judge erred in granting judgment to the defendant. For summary judgment to be granted to a defendant, the affidavits offered in support of the defendant’s motion must contain facts which, if uncontested, are sufficient to show that the plaintiff’s claim has no merit. It is therefore incumbent upon the trial court to address itself to the question of whether the evidentiary facts set forth in the movant’s affidavits are sufficient to vitiate the plaintiff’s cause of action.

In the instant case, the defendant’s affidavit did not purport to meet the cause of action…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Van Winkle v. American Steam Boiler Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
  4. Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Leszczynski v. SurgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Smith v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Sims v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Gritzner v. Michael R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API