Legal Opinion

State v. Strickland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 20, 2014No. 120135CR; A153777PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevore, J.

In this criminal case, the state appeals the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion in limine preventing the state from introducing evidence of a prior conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. See ORS 138.060(l)(c) (appeal from order suppressing evidence). The state first assigns error to the trial court’s denial of the state’s request to call defendant as a witness for cross-examination, arguing that defendant had waived his right against self-incrimination by submitting an affidavit. Second, because the state had been precluded from developing cross-examination, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. MendeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. M. T. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API