Legal Opinion

Naas v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-250PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

D. BROOKS SMITH, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Paul L. Naas (Naas) was an employee of defendant Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse) for thirty-three (33) years until he was discharged as part of a plantwide reduction in force (RIF), effee tive October 1, 1991. At the time of his termination, 1 Naas, then age sixty (60), was employed as a “Senior Systems Consulting Analyst.” On October 29, 1991, Naas timely filed a Charge of Discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission alleging that his termination violated the Age Discrimination in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Haverford CollegeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Kelly v. Drexel UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Davis v. Sheraton Society Hill HotelDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Hicks v. ArthurDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Solt v. Alpo Petfoods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API