Legal Opinion

State v. Corno

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 28, 1994No. 1 CA-CR 91-1863PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOSS, Judge.

The State of Arizona appeals from an order denying its motion to withdraw from a plea agreement after the court rejected a stipulation that defendant’s conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia be designated a class 6 felony at sentencing. Because the sentencing judge erred in denying the motion, we remand for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellee David Gene Corno (defendant) was charged by information with one count of possession of narcotic drugs (cocaine), a class 4 felony and one count of possession of drug…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. State v. DiazArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. WintonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. State v. RicheyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aragon v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. People v. GuillenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. Canava v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. State v. SantillanesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022
  5. In Re James W.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API