Aragon v. Wilkinson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Barbara Aragon filed this special action petition arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by granting the State’s motion to withdraw from a plea agreement that the court had previously accepted. To resolve this issue, we must decide whether the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), coupled with Aragon’s refusal to waive her right to a jury trial on the existence of factors sufficient to allow the court to impose an aggravated sentence, justified the State’s motion…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Vo v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Galindez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- State v. MaugaotegaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SchofieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- State v. JessHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ChauvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.