Legal Opinion

Aragon v. Wilkinson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 1, 2004No. 1 CA-SA 04-0183PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Barbara Aragon filed this special action petition arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by granting the State’s motion to withdraw from a plea agreement that the court had previously accepted. To resolve this issue, we must decide whether the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), coupled with Aragon’s refusal to waive her right to a jury trial on the existence of factors sufficient to allow the court to impose an aggravated sentence, justified the State’s motion…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Vo v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Galindez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. State v. MaugaotegaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. SchofieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  4. State v. JessHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. ChauvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API