Legal Opinion

State v. Richey

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 23, 1988No. 1 CA-CIV 9400PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

A St. Johns Justice Court found appellant guilty of violating A.R.S. § 28-411(A), driving without an Arizona operator’s license, and A.R.S. § 28-302(A), failure to register a vehicle in Arizona. The appellant appealed to the Superior Court of Apache County, which held a trial de novo and once again found appellant guilty of both offenses. Appellant raises four issues on appeal:

1. Does A.R.S. § 28-102(A)(l), which defines “resident” for purposes of registering and operating a vehicle in Arizona, violate the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment or…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RicheyArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. State v. Dutch Harbor Seafoods, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. CornoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Amancio v. ForsterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API