Legal Opinion

State v. Rutherford

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 15, 1987No. 1 CA-CR 10649PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

The state appeals from the trial court’s order modifying appellee Rutherford’s probation. This order modified a previous condition of probation which required Ruther ford to serve one year “flat” in the county jail. Previously, the parties executed a plea agreement which provided in relevant part that:

The parties stipulate to the following additional terms: (These stipulations are subject to court approval at the time of sentencing as set forth in paragraph 5.) If the defendant is placed on probation he shall serve one year (flat) in the county jail.

The trial court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. EthingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. MurphyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Green v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. FalknerArizona Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ThorneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Nieuwenhuis v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. State v. Hon. hancock/jennifer FerrellArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. CornoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. State v. PatelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API