Legal Opinion

Jean P. Lacotte, and Claude Puech v. Harold T. Thomas, and Dennis S. Howe

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 29, 1985No. Appeal 84-1693PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Circuit Judge.

Jean P. Lacotte and Claude Puech (Lacotte) appeal from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Interferences (board) in Interference No. 100,867, awarding priority to the junior party, Harold T. Thomas and Dennis J. Howe (Thomas). We affirm.

Background

The application of senior party Lacotte, filed November 26, 1979, and assigned to Thomas Brandt, a French corporation, was accorded the benefit of its French application filing date of May 7, 1975 under 35 U.S.C. § 119. The application of junior party Thomas has an effective filing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John H. Coleman v. Martin B. DinesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Reese v. HurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  3. Berges v. GottsteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hahn v. WongCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. Michael S. Brown, Joseph L. Goldstein, and Yuval Reiss v. Mariano Barbacid and Veeraswamy ManneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Nfc Technology, LLC v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  4. Loral Fairchild Corporation v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Weatherchem Corp. v. J.L. Clark, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API