Michael S. Brown, Joseph L. Goldstein, and Yuval Reiss v. Mariano Barbacid and Veeraswamy Manne
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal of an invention priority determination, called a patent “interference” proceeding, returns to the Federal Circuit from the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the “Board”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The parties are Michael Brown, Joseph Gold-stein and Yuval Reiss (together “Brown”) and Mariano Barbacid and Veeraswamy Manne (together “Barbacid”). The invention common to Brown and Barbacid is a method or assay for identifying compounds that inhibit farnesyl transferase (“FT”), an enzyme involved in the control of cell…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Dr. Sakharam D. Mahurkar v. C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc. And Bard Access Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- In Re Sang-Su LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Falko-Gunter Falkner, Georg Holzer, and Friedrich Dorner v. Stephen C. Inglis, Michael E.G. Boursnell, and Anthony C. MinsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Arctic Cat Inc. v. Gep Power Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Shuffle Master, Inc. v. MP GAMES LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.