Legal Opinion

Lofthus v. Cumming

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1939No. 27252. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the superior court establishing and foreclosing a lien claimed by the plaintiff for materials used in the construction of a residence in the city of Bremerton.

The defendant E. O. Cumming, a housebuilder, desired to erect a residence in an addition to Bremerton owned by J. W. Bryan, and it was agreed between them that Bryan and his wife should convey a plot of ground to Cumming, for the agreed price of five hundred fifty dollars. No part of the purchase price was paid in cash, but Cumming and wife executed their note, in favor of Bryan, for the purchase price,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. ManskeIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Alexiou v. NockasWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Rogers v. RowlandWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Swenland v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whittaker v. WellerWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. McCoy v. CourtneyWashington Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API