Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Rowland
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1932No. 23242. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
Bert Rogers and wife brought an action for a money judgment against the defendant R. L. Rowland, and for the establishing of a claim against his bond upon a highway contract. Jacob Olderness and wife brought an action for the same purpose. The two actions were, by stipulation, consolidated. The trial was to the court without a jury, aud resulted in a judgment dismissing the actions and disallowing any claim against the bond. From this judgment, Mr. and Mrs. Rogers and Mr. and Mrs. Olderness appeal.
May 31,1929, R. L. Rowland entered into a contract with the state, by and through the highway…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Keokee Consolidated Coke Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Hurley-Mason Co. v. American Bonding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- West v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Western Clinic & Hospital Ass'n v. Gabriel Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Alexiou v. NockasWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Gerson v. SussmanWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Lofthus v. CummingWashington Supreme Court · 1939