Legal Opinion

Howard Mark Sandler v. Curtis W. Tarr, National Director of Selective Service

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1972No. 71-2158PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a denial of preinduction relief ’by a registrant, who was refused by his Selective Service Board a Class III-A fatherhood classification pursuant to the terms of the exception incorporated in Selective Service Regulation 1622.30(a), 32 C.F.R., sec. 1622.30 (a). 1 While the registrant challenges the validity of the regulation, his primary claim is that, as a member of the class embraced in the action styled Gregory v. Hershey (D.C.Mich.1969) 311 F. Supp. 1, and entitled to the benefit of the injunction granted by the District Court in that case, he should have been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stephen L. Gregory, James E. Hovis, John B. Sharpless Ii, Richard J. Silverman v. Curtis W. Tarr, National Director of Selective ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  2. Gregory v. HersheyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1969
  3. Paul Robert Pasquier v. Curtis W. TarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Sandler v. TarrDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Edward R. Zeilstra v. Curtis W. Tarr, National Director of Selective ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  2. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. YeutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Hoskins Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  4. In Re One Minor ChildSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. Collins v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API