Legal Opinion
Hoskins Lumber Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 25, 1991No. 323-88 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HODGES, Judge.
This court has jurisdiction of this case pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1988). The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to RUSCC 56. Because there are no issues of material fact in dispute, disposition in a summary *261judgment proceeding is appropriate. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted as to liability.
FACTS
The Griffith Middlefork 78 timber sale contract was awarded to Hoskins Lumber Co. Inc. (“Hoskins”) on October 13,1978 by the United States Forest Service. During the late 1970’s and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stone Forest Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Applegate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Infrastructure Defense Technologies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Hoskins Lumber Co., Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Hoskins Lumber Co., Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994