Legal Opinion

Collins v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 20, 1985No. 97PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

We shall here hold that the District Court may dismiss a claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

The action arose when Charles Foster, an inmate of the Maryland Penitentiary, filed a claim in the District Court *330against the warden of that institution alleging a lack of dental treatment. Trial was scheduled for September 23, 1983. On September 16, 1983, the warden filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the District Court was without jurisdiction because the inmate had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies under the Inmate Grievance Commission statute,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oxtoby v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Loughran v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. Highfield Water Co. v. Washington County Sanitary DistrictCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Board of Medical Examiners v. StewardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCullough v. WittnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Muhl v. MaganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Quesenberry v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API