Legal Opinion
Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. Yeutter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 14, 1992No. Nos. 90-35443, 90-35509PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The appellants’ request for publication is GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed December 2, 1991, is redesignated as an authored opinion by Judge Goodwin.
OPINION
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
The Forest Service appeals summary judgment for two timber companies seek*870ing extensions of defaulted contracts to purchase Forest Service timber. The Forest Service had denied their applications as untimely. We reverse.
These actions arise out of difficulties experienced by appellees Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. (“Hampton”) and Suntip Co. (“Suntip”) in fulfilling their contracts with the Forest Service to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- North Side Lumber Co. v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Scott & Fetzer Co. v. DileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Marx E. Angle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi NegaraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Bauer v. ShepardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Hoskins Lumber Co., Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Suntip Company, United States of America v. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.