Pajak v. Rohm & Haas Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
In a diversity suit, this Court acts as "the functional equivalent of a state court sitting in the forum state." See Astro-Med, Inc. v. Nihon Kohden America, Inc., 591 F.3d 1, 8 (1st Cir. 2009). As such, this Court must determine whether 1) jurisdiction is permitted by the Massachusetts long-arm statute and 2) the exercise of jurisdiction coheres with the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. Id. Alfa Laval does not contend that plaintiff has failed to satisfy the Massachusetts long-arm statute nor does plaintiff assert that Alfa Laval is subject to general personal…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Costa v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Ericson v. Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- HOOKER v. UNITED STATESDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
- Kingston v. AngioDynamics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021