Legal Opinion
Kingston v. AngioDynamics, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 16, 2021No. 1:21-cv-10234Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS __________________________________________ ) ) DEBRA KINGSTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 21-cv-10234-DJC ) ANGIODYNAMICS, INC. & ) NAVILYST MEDICAL, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) __________________________________________) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASPER, J. July 16, 2021 I. Introduction Plaintiff Debra Kingston (“Kingston”) has filed this lawsuit against Defendants AngioDynamics, Inc. (“AngioDynamics”) and Navilyst Medical, Inc. (“Navilyst”) (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging that she suffered injuries from a defective implantable…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.