Ponder v. Davis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Tbe principal question for decision is whether the judgment of Judge Nettles, finding the defendants guilty of contempt, and the judgment of Judge Rudisill, imposing punishments on such finding, or either of them, can be sustained. The record impels a negative answer.
I. The JudgmeNt of Judge Nettles.
In the first place, it should be noted that by G.S. 5-9, “In all proceedings for contempt and in proceedings as for contempt, the judge or other judicial officer who issues the rule or notice to the respondent may make the same returnable before some other judge or judicial officer”; and “When the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. ParksSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Snyder's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- U'ren v. BagleyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. JeffersArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Love v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.