Legal Opinion
In Re Steele
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 7, 1942PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
We have here a challenge to a part of the judicial system of the State. As no appeal lies from a judgment rendered on return to writ of habeas corpus, except in cases involving the care and custody of children, a review is permissible by certiorari, which has been issued in the instant case. In re Holley, 154 N. C., 163, 69 S. E., 872; In re Croom, 175 N. C., 455, 95 S. E., 903; S. v. Phillips, 185 N. C., 614, 115 S. E., 893; In re Veasey, 196 N. C., 662, 146 S. E., 599; In re Adams, 218 N. C., 379, 11 S. E. (2d), 163.
The order releasing the prisoner from custody is grounded on the assumption…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tari v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Rhyne v. . LipscombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Danville Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Gallivan Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- State v. . HartsfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Manufacturing Co. v. . Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- McKinley Brown, Etc. v. T. A. Vance, Etc., Mary Jean Boone, Etc., Cross-Appellee v. Walter L. Dennis, Etc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Smith v. BroughDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.