Legal Opinion
Foster v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1938No. Civ. 11694PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
By this proceeding petitioners seek a peremptory writ of mandate directing respondent to substitute Paul R. Hutchinson as their attorney in the place and stead of Olson & Olson. C. L. Olson and R. C. Olson are attorneys at law and comprise the firm of Olson & Olson. They are attorneys-of record of the petitioners, who are interveners and cross-complainants in the superior court case of Carson v. Barnhart-Morrow Consolidated, which is an action to quiet title to and to determine adverse interests in personal property, i. e., the sum of $43,451.25 impounded in the custody of the court, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hawkins v. BleaklySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Ison v. Western Vegetable DistributorsArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. OsbornSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Gregory v. HeckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Echlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Nebraska v. WellsNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. HymesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Nielson v. City of GoodingIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Tracy v. MacIntyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.