Legal Opinion
Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Shimadzu
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 19, 1941No. Nos. 7602, 7626PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
Genzo Shimadzu and another sued The Electric Storage- Battery Company, alleging the infringement of six patents for the production of fine lead powder suitable for use upon the plates of storage batteries or for the manufacture of paint. The District Court held all of the claims of the patents in litigation valid and furthermore held claims 1 and 2 of Patent No. 1,584,149, claims 1 to 4, 6, and 8 to 13 of Patent No. 1,584,150 and claims 10 and 11 of Patent No. 1,896,020 to be infringed. The court held all other'claims in issue of the patents to be not infringed. See 17…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- General Electric Co. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
- SMIMADZU v. Electric Storage Battery Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schmidinger v. WelshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Hollywood-Maxwell Co. v. Street's of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Floridin Co. v. Attapulgus Clay Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Congoleum Industries, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Union Carbide Corp. v. Traver Investments, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.