Legal Opinion

SMIMADZU v. Electric Storage Battery Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1936No. 7727PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.'

This is a suit in equity for the infringement of six patents, Nos. 1,584,149; 1,584,150; 1,584,151; 1,584,152; 1,584,479; and 1,896,020, all of which have to do with the production of fine powder of lead by the abrasion of larger pieces of metallic lead in a dry state. Various claims of the six patents cover process, product, and apparatus. The claims in suit are 1 and 2 of 1,584,149; 1-4, 6, 8-17 of 1,584,150; 1-5 of 1,584,151; all claims of 1,584,152; 1-4 of 1,584,479; and 10 and 11 of 1,896,-020.

The product is used in the manufacture of plates for storage…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. General Electric Co. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  4. Minerals Separation North American Corp. v. Magma Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. Comstock Unhairing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1970
  3. EJ Brooks Co. v. Stoffel Seals CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  4. Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  5. Shimadzu v. Electric Storage Battery Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API