Legal Opinion
Hollywood-Maxwell Co. v. Street's of Tulsa
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 22, 1950No. 4016PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
Appellant sued for infringement of its patent 1,997,995 (filed 1933 and issued to J. R. Bowen in 1935), relating to a brassiere designed to hold the breasts firmly in a conical shaped upright position, so as to lend attractiveness to the female figure. The prayer was for a decree of validity, infringement, and the usual injunctive relief. The trial court first held the patent valid and infringed. On remand for further evidence, however, the patent was held invalid for anticipation in view o'f a French patent number 613,888 (filed 1925 in Paris and issued in 1926), not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. MedartSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kobe, Inc. v. Dempsey Pump Co. Dempsey Pump Co. v. Kobe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Allied Wheel Products, Inc. v. RudeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Domer Scaramucci and William A. Moore v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Consolidated Electrodynamics Corporation, a Corporation v. Midwestern Instruments, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.