Legal Opinion
Congoleum Industries, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 23, 1972No. Civ. A. 41762PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
HANNUM, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is an action for infringement of United States Letters Patent 3,293,094 and 3,293,108 (hereinafter the “ ’094 patent” and the “’108 patent”, respectively). The ’094 patent is entitled “TEXTURED FOAM PROCESSES” and the '108 patent is entitled “TEXTURED FOAM PRODUCTS”. Both patents were granted on December 20, 1966 and were issued to plaintiff’s predecessor, Congoleum-Nairn, Inc., as an assignee of the applicants R. Frank Nairn, Joseph C. Harkins, Jr., Frank E. Ehrenfeld, Jr., and Hilton…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United States Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. Kollsman Instrument CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mueller Brass Co. v. Reading Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Jamesbury Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Congoleum Industries, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH v. Dart Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.