Legal Opinion
Kalia v. St. Cloud State University
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 21, 1995No. C7-95-730PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Respondent Kalia sued his current employer for unlawful discrimination in promotion, retention, tenure and emotional distress under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA). Appellant St. Cloud State University (SCSU) moved the court for summary judgment, claiming that, as a government entity, it is protected from liability by official immunity. SCSU further claimed that, as a public body, it is entitled to protection by vicarious official immunity for the acts of the University president, who is responsible for making the decisions regarding Kalia’s career. The district…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bazemore v. FridaySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Kalia v. St. Cloud State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Ott v. City of ChamplinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Sandhu v. KanzlerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- Shelly Marie Ott v. City of ChamplinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996