Legal Opinion
Krug v. Offerman, Fallon, Mahoney & Cassano
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 20, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Appeal (transferred to this Court by order of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department) from an order of the Supreme Court (Dadd, J.), entered July 9, 1993 in Erie County, which denied defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint for, inter alia, lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Defendant Offerman, Fallon, Mahoney & Cassano (hereinafter the firm) was retained by Charles Hahn to represent him in his claim for damages due to injuries he sustained as the result of an accident while a passenger in an automobile operated by a co-worker and owned by his employer. The accident occurred at about…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crosby v. WORKERS'COMP.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Carter v. Katz, Shandell, Katz & ErasmousNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Nicholson v. NasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schweizer v. MulvehillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Aiello v. AdarNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Krug v. Offerman, Fallon, Mahoney & CassanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Moss v. Gurfein Douglas, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020