Nicholson v. Nason
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis R. Friedman, J., upon the decision of Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered on or about October 16, 1992, which, in an action seeking to enforce a fee-splitting *474agreement between lawyers, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
We agree with the IAS Court that plaintiffs association with defendant did not amount to an "Of Counsel” relationship, and thus find it unnecessary to decide whether the prohibition against fee-splitting found in Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-107 (22 NYCRR 1200.12) applies to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Oberman v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Carter v. Katz, Shandell, Katz & ErasmousNew York Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alderman v. Pan Am World AirwaysCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Aiello v. AdarNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Krug v. Offerman, Fallon, Mahoney & CassanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Gold v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Easton & Echtman v. AurnouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.