Legal Opinion
Schweizer v. Mulvehill
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 2000No. 95 CIV. 10743 MGCMHDPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
In a thorough and thoughtful Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Dolinger has recommended that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted as to all claims against John Mul-vehill. He has recommended that the motion be granted as to all claims against Urban Mulvehill except the portion of plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary duty claim which alleges that Urban Mulvehill failed to disclose to plaintiff that he was receiving a portion of John Mulvehill’s fee. Finally, he has recommended that John Mul-vehill’s motion for sanctions and…
2Cases cited161 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Wyly v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Butler v. Biocore Medical Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Lan Sang v. Ming HaiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Kirk v. HepptDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Cecala v. NewmanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.