Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Ives

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 17, 1963PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.

These two cases involve separate but similar accidents, each involving the collision of an automobile with an abutment on a highway maintained by the defendant. They were separately .heard in the trial court but on appeal were argued together.

In the Murphy case, suit was instituted against the defendant, as highway commissioner, for the recovery of damages for the wrongful death of the plaintiff’s intestate. In the Donnelly case, suit was instituted for the recovery of damages for personal injuries. In each case, the first count of the complaint alleged a cause of action under the so-called…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Bergner v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  3. Bacon v. Town of Rocky HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  4. Perrotti v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. State v. KilburnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Jones v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  2. Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Duguay v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Spring v. ConstantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API