Legal Opinion

United States v. Jerry Jacangelo

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 26, 1960No. 13111_1PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Jacangelo and another man were tried together and convicted of conspiracy to transport forged “bondified” money orders in interstate commerce. Appellant was also convicted of the substantive offense of illegal transportation of the money orders. By far the most impressive and damaging evidence of Jaeangelo’s guilt, indeed, the only evidence unequivocally connecting him with the essential interstate transportation of the money orders, was an elaborate written confession, which had been signed by his codefendant after the termination of the alleged conspiracy.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. SantiagoHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  2. United States v. KahanerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  3. William K. Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Henry Maestas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. United States v. Louis Nakaladski, A/K/A Louis Nash, Ettore Coco, A/K/A Eddie CocoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API